What does Newcomb's paradox teach us?

نویسندگان

  • David H. Wolpert
  • Gregory Benford
چکیده

In Newcomb’s paradox you choose to receive either the contents of a particular closed box, or the contents of both that closed box and another one. Before you choose, a prediction algorithm deduces your choice, and fills the two boxes based on that deduction. Newcomb’s paradox is that game theory appears to provide two conflicting recommendations for what choice you should make in this scenario. We analyze Newcomb’s paradox using a recent extension of game theory in which the players set conditional probability distributions in a Bayes net. We show that the two game theory recommendations in Newcomb’s scenario have different presumptions for what Bayes net relates your choice and the algorithm’s prediction. We resolve the paradox by proving that these two Bayes nets are incompatible. We also show that the accuracy of the algorithm’s prediction, the focus of much previous work, is irrelevant. In addition we show that Newcomb’s scenario only provides a contradiction between game theory’s expected utility and dominance principles if one is sloppy in specifying the underlying Bayes net. We also show that Newcomb’s paradox is time-reversal invariant; both the paradox and its resolution are unchanged if the algorithm makes its ‘prediction’ after you make your choice rather than before.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

2 00 9 What does Newcomb ’ s paradox teach us ?

Newcomb's paradox highlights an apparent conflict involving the axioms of game theory. It concerns a game in which you choose to take either one or both of two closed boxes. However before you choose, a prediction algorithm deduces your choice, and fills the two boxes based on that deduction. The paradox is that game theory appears to provide two conflicting recommendations for what choice you ...

متن کامل

The lesson of Newcomb's paradox

In Newcomb’s paradox you can choose to receive either the contents of a particular closed box, or the contents of both that closed box and another one. Before you choose though, an antagonist uses a prediction algorithm to accurately deduce your choice, and uses that deduction to fill the two boxes in a way that lessens the value of your choice. Newcomb’s paradox is that game theory’s expected ...

متن کامل

Real-world implementation of Newcomb's thought experiment, using mouse-tracking techniques

Newcomb’s paradox is a famous thought experiment in the field of decision theory. There are two paradoxical, yet “rational”, strategies to approach this decision-making problem. We addressed this debate by testing the paradox in a real world experiment. Analyzing participants’ mouse movements allowed us to reveal the internal cognitive dynamics of their thought process during the task explanati...

متن کامل

Important Topics on Contemporary Total knee Arthroplasty: what Does Recent Literature Say?

In this Editorial I want to comment on eight recent articles that can help us to better understand still controversial matters related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this Editorial I want to comment on eight recent articles that can help us to better understand still controversial matters related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/0904.2540  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009